0%
AI INFRASTRUCTURE

The compute layer your AI runs on, right-sized.

Renting frontier-model APIs is the right start — but at scale, or under data-residency rules, you need your own serving stack: GPUs that aren't idle half the day, Kubernetes that autoscales with traffic, and open-source models served fast with vLLM. Dezvo designs and runs AI infrastructure that matches the workload instead of the hype.

See Our Work
Infrastructure stack
  • GPU selection & capacity planning
  • AWS / GCP / Azure / bare-metal
  • Kubernetes + Docker serving
  • vLLM / TGI model hosting
  • Autoscaling & cost guardrails
API OR SELF-HOSTED?

The build-vs-rent question for AI compute.

Most products should start on hosted APIs (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google): zero infrastructure, frontier quality, pay-per-token. Self-hosting open-source models on your own GPUs wins in three cases — sustained high volume where per-token API costs exceed hardware costs, data-residency or privacy rules that forbid external APIs, and latency-critical or fine-tuned workloads that need dedicated serving.

The mistake is treating this as ideology. It's arithmetic: tokens per day, GPU utilisation, and ops headcount. Dezvo runs that arithmetic with you first — and about half the time we recommend staying on APIs with better routing and caching instead of buying GPUs.

WHAT WE SET UP

From GPU quote to serving endpoint.

GPU infrastructure

Right-sized GPU selection (L4 to H100), spot and reserved capacity strategy, and utilisation monitoring — because idle GPUs are the most expensive kind.

Cloud deployment

AWS, GCP, Azure, or cost-effective providers like Hetzner — VPC isolation, IAM, and networking designed with the same rigour as your app infra.

Kubernetes & Docker

Containerised model serving with GPU scheduling, autoscaling on queue depth, health checks, and zero-downtime model swaps.

Model hosting

Open-source models (Llama, Mistral, Qwen) served via vLLM or TGI with continuous batching, quantisation where quality allows, and OpenAI-compatible endpoints your code already speaks.

FAQ

Common questions, answered.

If your question isn't here, message us — usually same-day reply.

Run the numbers: below roughly 5-10 million tokens per day, hosted APIs are almost always cheaper once you count GPU hours, ops time, and idle capacity. Above that — or under strict data-residency rules — self-hosting open-source models starts winning. We model your actual traffic before recommending either; often the answer is a hybrid (API for the frontier tasks, self-hosted for the high-volume narrow ones).

A single L4 or A10G instance for a 7-8B model runs $400-$900/month; serving a 70B model well needs A100/H100-class hardware from $2,000-$8,000/month depending on provider and commitment. Spot instances and quantisation can cut this sharply. We publish the cost model up front so there are no surprise invoices.

Whichever you already run — consolidation usually beats marginal GPU pricing. All three hyperscalers serve AI workloads well: AWS has the broadest GPU fleet, GCP pairs naturally with Vertex and TPUs, Azure fits Microsoft-stack enterprises. For pure price-performance on self-hosted inference, Hetzner and specialist GPU clouds can halve the bill when compliance allows.

Yes, incrementally. We benchmark open-source models against your current quality bar on your eval set, serve them behind an OpenAI-compatible endpoint (vLLM), and shift traffic route by route — keeping frontier APIs for the tasks where open-source doesn't yet match. No big-bang cutover, and quality is measured at every step.
RELATED SERVICES

Bundle the services that work together.

Currently accepting projects

Ready to get started?

Tell us where you're at. Scope, quote, and timeline back within 24 hours.